Does Franchise Maturity Make a Difference in Investment Risk?

Published on June 19, 2017

Share Tweet Share

When someone thinks of franchising, typically they think of national brands like McDonalds or Chick-Fil-A. In reality, over 70% of franchise systems have less than 100 outlets and 45% have less than 25 outlets.

This staggering long-tail of franchising is rarely discussed. Focus is typically put on these larger franchise concepts as the golden standard of franchising. Looking further into the industry, there are multiple investment opportunities that are overlooked by prospective franchisees.

Classifying franchise opportunities as the following helps put the industry into perspective:

  1. Established:
  2. These are franchises that have grown to household names. Typically, above 500 outlets across the country.

  3. Developing:
  4. Are franchises who have significant market penetration, but not national recognition. These are typically 100-500 outlets.

  5. Emerging:
  6. These are franchises that have made it through certain growth hurdles and are not seeking expansion. Typically, these are between 5-100 outlets.

  7. Start-up:
  8. These are franchises that have limited exposure, and are the largest group of franchises across the US. These brands range in size from 0-5 outlets.

does-franchise-maturity-make-a-difference-in-investment-risk
One would assume that the larger, established franchises pose less risk, and that the start-up franchises are the highest risk. There is a slight increase in risk, but it’s not as prominent as one would think.

The average Franchisee Turnover Rate (FTR) of an emerging franchise between 5 and 100 outlets is 9.3%. The average FTR for a franchise between 100-500 outlets is 9.8% and above 500 is 8.5%. Start-ups face the highest turnover risk at 12.2%.

What’s interesting about the data is the commonality of the turnover. All franchise maturity levels face around a 10% turnover rate. This is consistent with a variety of other studies we’ve performed over the last 5 years.

What this means for prospective franchisees is that focusing on a national Established or Developing brand may not be the best investment opportunity. It may be that an Emerging or even Start-up would represent the best franchise opportunity for an investor. The opportunity to invest into a franchise with a regional or state presence may be as good an investment when compared to a national franchise opportunity.

There are several factors that should be considered to determine if a franchise is a healthy investment option, with unit economics and profitability be first and foremost. But, analyzing the data indicates that size of a franchise investment may not be as high a risk factor as expected.


About the Author: Jeff Lefler
As the CEO of FranchiseGrade.com, Jeff understands that there is no Silver Bullet or sure-fire, simple way to pick a guaranteed franchise system winner. However, by using a little science and a lot of hard work, Jeff and the team at FranchiseGrade.com have developed a sophisticated research, analysis and comparison model to help potential investors and existing Franchisees assess a realistic value for any franchise system relative to others. It's called a Franchise Grade. With over fifteen years of small business experience and ten working in franchising as a multi-unit Franchisee, consultant and Franchisee Association President, Jeff has a good understanding of the level of hard work, dedication and commitment that drives a successful franchise system. As part of his ongoing involvement with the industry, Jeff also served as a Member of the Strategic Committee of the International Association of Franchisees and Dealers. Get in touch with Jeff to see how your system measures up.
Does franchise maturity make a difference in investment risk

TWO MEN AND A TRUCK logo

A+

Grade
Certified as:
Mtg horizontal




Jane Stein
Brokers

Related Articles